DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MONITORING AND AUDITING
Introduction:
Monitoring:
Analyze the Flow of the business process, if it is controlled.
Quality Assurance.
Metrics /control measures (within bounds). Error rates, compliance rates, completion rates, accuracy rates, pass/fail thresholds, etc.
Triggers and escalation.
Spot checks.
A&M provides input in risk identification and verifies corrective actions.
Auditing:
Testing Output/Transactions/Items generated by a process.
Transactions-type Audits: Are claims, arrangements, enrollments, sales, etc correct/compliant?
Process/Systems: Do controls/procedures exist and work? – Verification Audits.
Auditing & Monitoring: Scope.
Auditing & Monitoring: Responsibilities.
Difference:
Auditing & Monitoring Program: Conclusion.
Auditing & Monitoring Program – Final Food for Thought
Rely on formal methods (Probability/Impact, Criticality Measure).
Define and Use metrics.
Include financial error rate into billing monitoring programs.
Set expectations what/how internal monitoring by operations is to report to Compliance.
Include formalized escalation procedures from routine to non routine auditing and monitoring.
Start small when using sampling and rely on threshold measures to decide on deeper dives.
Keep it simple.
Aggregate and trend, don’t lose sight of the big picture.
Incorporate sampling strategies that can easily be followed.
If extrapolation and disclosure is an issues, consider seeking outside help to raise the credibility of results. – Venture into data mining.
Reference:
Google.
Cornelia M. Dorfschmid, Ph.D. Strategic Management Services, LLC Washington, DC March 14, 2014
© 2014 Strategic Management Services, LLC
Student Name: Godawari Dnyaneshwar Balurkar
Student ID: 017/012023
Qualification: B-Pharm
e-Mail ID: gbalurkar23@gmail.com
Comments