DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MONITORING AND AUDITING

Introduction:

Monitoring:

  • Analyze the Flow of the business process, if it is controlled. 

  • Quality Assurance.

  • Metrics /control measures (within bounds). Error rates, compliance rates, completion rates, accuracy rates, pass/fail thresholds, etc.

  • Triggers and escalation.

  • Spot checks.

  • A&M provides input in risk identification and verifies corrective actions.  

Auditing:

  • Testing Output/Transactions/Items generated by a process.

  • Transactions-type Audits: Are claims, arrangements, enrollments, sales, etc correct/compliant? 

  • Process/Systems: Do controls/procedures exist and work? – Verification Audits.

Auditing & Monitoring: Scope.


Auditing & Monitoring: Responsibilities.


Difference:

Monitoring

Auditing

  • It is a continuous process.

  • It is done either during trial or after the completion of trial.

  • It controls quality of trial.

  • It assures quality of trial.

  • It is done by monitoring who is a part of the trial.

  • It is done by an independent personal of trial.

  • Appointed by the sponsor

  • Appointed by Regulatory Authorities.

  • Part of the study conduct.

  • Independent third party.

  • Study conduct.

  • Study compliance.

  • Study duration

  • One time point.

  • Ongoing review of quality.

  • Snap shot of compliance.

  • Focused on data and daily activities of a site

  • Focus on processes and system.

  • Flag the issue and suggest remedial action.

  • Evaluate if remedial action is working.

  • Monitoring report + follow-up letter.

  • Audit report noting non-compliances.

  • Reply to follow-up letter.

  • Corrective and Preventive action plan(CAPA).



Auditing & Monitoring Program: Conclusion.


Auditing & Monitoring Program – Final Food for Thought

  • Rely on formal methods (Probability/Impact, Criticality Measure).

  • Define and Use metrics.

  • Include financial error rate into billing monitoring programs.

  • Set expectations what/how internal monitoring by operations is to report to Compliance.

  • Include formalized escalation procedures from routine to non routine auditing and monitoring.

  • Start small when using sampling and rely on threshold measures to decide on deeper dives.

  • Keep it simple. 

  • Aggregate and trend, don’t lose sight of the big picture.

  • Incorporate sampling strategies that can easily be followed.

  • If extrapolation and disclosure is an issues, consider seeking outside help to raise the credibility of results. – Venture into data mining.

Reference:

  1. Google.

  2. Cornelia M. Dorfschmid, Ph.D. Strategic Management Services, LLC Washington, DC March 14, 2014

© 2014 Strategic Management Services, LLC



Student Name: Godawari Dnyaneshwar Balurkar

Student ID: 017/012023

Qualification: B-Pharm

e-Mail ID: gbalurkar23@gmail.com


Comments

Popular Posts