Patient Centricity in Pharmacovigilance
INTRODUCTION
Pharmacovigilance (PV) is becoming increasingly
prominent as a science, also its role in effective patient care and public
health is emerging.
The past decade has seen remarkable growth in
patient engagement in health care, to point that the term “Patient centricity” has been introduced steadily in all
patient-related activities.
This is particularly true in clinical research,
where patients have shifted from passive enrolled subjects to active
participants. The significance and impact of the patient perspective in drug
safety reporting are now apparent.
Patient-centeredness and patient safety have become
fundamental to today’s interactive and responsive healthcare systems. The focus
on patients has become a recognized feature not only of high-quality health
care but also of high-quality drug development. As patients become
increasingly interested in their health and in healthcare, they support the
maximum of ‘‘Nothing about me, without
me”.
In this evolutionary scenario, pharmacovigilance has not been a primary testing ground for patient engagement. It is an area where only healthcare professionals are competent to deal with adverse events and associated risks; on the other hand, patients have not been encouraged to play a more active role in this issue.
The most important objective of pharmacovigilance has been to detect and
report serious side effects, a task well performed by today's state-of-the-art
pharmacovigilance systems designed to ensure patient safety and an early
response to any alert.
Much effort has been invested in developing new methodologies for collecting the patient perspective along the clinical trial journey, Patients’ perspectives incorporation into pharmacovigilance (PV):
·
ADR reporting
·
Signal detection and
evaluation
·
Risk management,
·
Medication error
assessment
·
Benefit–risk assessment
and risk communication.
Effective patient-centric PV model is entrenched
in 6 stepladders;
One of the key approaches in patient-centric PV
is raising patient awareness. Social media can also serve as an effective
digital tool for risk assessment & communication for PV Professionals
within the companies to directly connect and engage with patients, customers, and
HCPs.
Encouraging Factors and barriers in ADR Reporting
Why Did Patients
report? |
Why Did Patients not
report? |
· ADR was serious · Worried about their situation · Wanted to share the experience · Wanted actions to be taken · Want extra information · ADR was not mentioned in the leaflet · Heard about the possibility of reporting · Family members assist them to report
|
·
Side effect was not serious ·
Side effect was expected or known ·
Discouraged by GP ·
Misguided ·
Lack of personal feedback
|
Methodologies
Seven databases were considered to identify
relevant publications related to patients’ participation in ADRs reporting.
· Google Scholar
· Science Direct-Elsevier
· SOPUS
· Medline
· Academic search complete “EBSCO”
· Health and Medical Complete ProQuest
Technologies
m Modern pharmacovigilance solutions combine information while rationalizing scientific and regulatory processes. These new tools help safety leaders target patients, utilize new data sources, and enhance collaboration with stakeholders.
CONCLUSION
The exact way to encourage direct
patient reporting in PV is to provide more value to the words of the patient and
work on better ways to involve them more in the process.
The importance of patient direct reports can be summed up as follows:
· They give more and better context than indirect reports from
professionals
· They generally describe the impact on people’s lives, which clinicians
rarely note
· Indirect and direct reports complement each other, producing
multicultural knowledge
· Knowledge of ADRs and their significance collects faster in drug safety societies
· Patients become active contributors to their care
· Patients learn how to manage their medicines and to connect better with experts.
Five questions guiding the way to actual patient-centricity;
1. Why do we work in healthcare?
2.
Do you know everything you need to know about your
patients?
3. Do we really want to engage in a dialogue with
patients?
4.
Are we ready to offer
value (beyond the drug) to the patient?
5. Do you know why, or when, a patient would want to
engage with you?
References:
1. Supriya Desai; “Patient centricity in pharmacovigilance: new directions and new
horizons for transformation”, Pharmacovigilance review, Volume 8/4, 2015
2. Meredith Y; “The Patient’s Voice in Pharmacovigilance: Pragmatic Approaches to
Building a Patient-Centric Drug Safety Organization”, Drug Saf (2016)
39:779–785
3. Hager Ali Saleh; “Patient-centered pharmacovigilance: A review”, Tropical Journal of
Pharmaceutical Research January 2018; 17 (1): 179-188
4. Kelly Traverso; “Moving to Patient-Centric Pharmacovigilance”, Journal of clinical
studies, 12(4) (Suppl1): S73–S77, 2013
Krina
Unadkat
M.Pharma-Pharmacology
Kanabar.krina7@gmail.com
Comments